About Me

Name: Resa
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Yeah. Sure. No Problem. Whatever. How the Self-Esteem Movement Drags Everyone Down.


When I was a child, we were taught that we should strive to do our best and that we should hold ourselves to high standards.  Sometimes, we failed and felt bad about it, but then came the self-esteem movement to rescue us from those bad feelings.

The psychologists said that it was most important not to hurt children’s feelings – that all children should be made to feel good about themselves, regardless of their performance.  So, to avoid bad feelings, the standards were removed. 

Instead of receiving letter grades that clearly reported the quality of their performance, children began receiving report cards that not even their parents could understand. Standards even disappeared from many children’s sporting events, with scores not being reported, nobody being allowed to lose, and everyone receiving a big trophy just for participating. 

This elimination of standards put an end to the bad feelings that used to result from failure, but it also put an end to the pride and excitement that used to come from true achievement – the pleasure and satisfaction that came from struggling to overcome hurdles and achieve success.  So, instead of the good feelings that had been expected by the psychologists, the result was just “blah” – a dullness and lack of enthusiasm about life.  In fact, many young people even became depressed.

Sadly, that is where we are today, with many of the products of the self-esteem movement having become jaded and unenthusiastic about life, if not suicidal.  They hold themselves to no standards, have an “entitlement” mentality, take no pride or pleasure in their work, and are disappointed when they are not rewarded handsomely just for showing up. 

Having been taught that there are no standards, their highest value is tolerance.  They believe that the people who strive to uphold traditional moral standards are a bunch of chumps.  They think stealing is OK, especially if it is stealing from a large, impersonal corporation.  They think having sex with anyone at any time is OK.  They think lying and cheating are OK.  In fact, they think just about everything is OK.  They have no worries about the consequences of their behavior and feel no need to plan or save for the future or for a rainy day.  Their idea of sin is to smoke, to eat transfats, or to fail to recycle their trash. 

So it should come as no surprise to find that these products of the self-esteem movement are maxed out on their credit cards, expecting to get all the rewards without having to work.  It should come as no surprise when they take “shortcuts”, like the executives at Enron or those who promoted and took advantage of the lax lending practices of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  It should come as no surprise that they are unhappy and depressed or that they expect to be bailed out by the government, even if it means taking the entire economy down with them. 

Is there any hope for improvement in the future?  Can the products of the self-esteem movement ever face reality, overcome their entitlement mentality, and become excited about working hard and achieving?  Will they ever experience the good feelings that come with striving for excellence and striving to live up to traditional values like honesty, hard work, thrift, and respect for other people and their property?  (i.e. the values that are essential to a healthy, thriving society.) Will they ever take pride and pleasure in exercising self-discipline and self-control?  Or are we all doomed?   

Yeah.  Sure.  No Problem.  Whatever.   

 

"If an American is to amount to anything he must rely upon himself, and not upon the State; he must take pride in his own work, instead of sitting idle to envy the luck of others. He must face life with resolute courage, win victory if he can, and accept defeat if he must, without seeking to place on his fellow man a responsibility which is not theirs." --Theodore Roosevelt

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whose children are they, anyway?


A California appeals court has recently decided that it is illegal for parents to home-school their children if the parents are not certified teachers.  The court said there is no Constitutional right to home-school.  This case cuts to the very core of our society – who has the authority and responsibility for raising and educating children – the parents or the government? 

 

We need to understand that this case has nothing to do with ensuring that children get a good education and everything to do with who controls them.  Home schooling families have proven repeatedly that they achieve superior educational results, regardless of the education level of the parents.  Far more children fall through the cracks and fail to learn in the public schools than in home schooling environments.  In fact, if the government really cared about educating children, it would encourage more home schooling, not less. 

 

But the government education complex is not about what is best for the children; it is all about what is best for itself and its friends.  As Albert Shanker, a former teacher’s union president once said, “When school children start paying union dues, that 's when I'll start representing the interests of school children.”

 

I home schooled one of my daughters for three years and find it somewhat ironic that I would be breaking the law if I were home schooling her in California today, since I am not a certified teacher.  Apparently, my degrees in engineering, Russian, and law, and my deep caring for my daughter would count for nothing; I would be forced to turn her education over to some stranger who may have been incapable of getting a college degree in a serious subject and instead became a certified teacher.  Maybe it would be someone like the teacher she had who couldn’t even manage to get the words spelled correctly on the bulletin board, or the teacher who allowed the other children in class to bully and abuse my daughter.  Or maybe it would be like the teacher my other daughter had, who herself was the class bully and who only stopped abusing my daughter when she began recording the classes.  But at least the teacher would be certified, having the stamp of approval of the state!

 

In the course of home-schooling my daughter, I had the opportunity to think very seriously about what I wanted her to get out of her education.  I realized that basic skills, such as reading and math, were very important, but it was also very important for her to learn good values, good habits, and how to think and problem-solve.  And this is the precisely the responsibility of parents – to raise good, responsible children. 

 

The fact is that, from the point of view of the government education complex, children are just pawns in a power game.  If the educrats can control the children, they will control the vast coffers of education money and the future of our society. 

 

If government has control over who becomes a certified teacher, and if government has the power to require children to be taught by certified teachers, and the power to force us to pay for that government-certified education, then government will dictate what our children learn, including the government-approved version of history, the government-approved set of values, and the government-approved relationship between the citizen and the state.  Do we really want folks like Bill and Hillary Clinton, Richard Nixon, or Arnold Schwarzenegger to have that kind of power?  Thanks, but I’d rather trust parents any day.

 

If parents lose control of the right to educate their own children as they think best, then we will have become subjects of the state, not sovereign citizens.  This is something that I would expect to see in Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany, not in a country that claims to be free.

 

(Note:  The Kentucky House of Representatives wants to require children to get a dental exam before they can attend public school.  Since one student’s teeth pose no risk or danger to another student, we can only assume that the dentists have lobbied for this perk.  Next, the legislature will be requiring every student to have new shoes, visit the chiropractor, and get a manicure, too!)

 

  "A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader."

-- Samuel Adams (letter to James Warren, 12 February 1779)

 

 

"If you're going to send your kids to Caesar, you're going to get Romans back."  -- Cal Thomas

http://townhall.com/columnists/CalThomas/2008/03/04/coming_out

Tags: education  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »